Investigating the function of PINK1 in cancer development and pathogenesis

PTEN‐induced kinase 1 (PINK1) was identified initially in cancer cells as a gene up‐regulated by overexpression of the central tumour suppressor, PTEN. Loss‐of‐function mutations in PINK1 were discovered subsequently to cause autosomal recessive Parkinsonʹs disease (ARPD). Despite much research focusing on the proposed mechanism(s) through which loss of PINKI function causes neurodegeneration, few studies have focused on a direct role for this serine/threonine kinase in cancer biology. The focus of this thesis was to examine a direct role for PINK1 function in tumourigenesis. Initial studies showed that loss of PINK1 reduces tumour‐associated phenotypes including cell growth, colony formation and invasiveness, in several cell types in vitro, indicating a pro‐tumourigenic role for PINK1 in cancer. Furthermore, results revealed for the first time that PINK1 deletion, examined in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFS) from PINK1 knock‐out animals, causes cell cycle defects, whereby cells arrest at in cytokinesis, giving rise to a highly significant increase in the number of multinucleated cells. This results in several key changes in the expression profile of cell cycle associated protein. In addition, PINK1‐deficient MEFs were found to resist cell cycle exit, with a proportion of cells remaining in proliferative phases upon removal of serum. The ability of cells to progress through mitosis conferred by PINK1 expression was independent of its kinase activity, while the cell cycle exit following serum withdrawal was kinase dependent. Investigations into the mechanism through which loss of PINK1 function gives rise to cell cycle defects revealed that dynamin related protein 1 (Drp1)‐mediated mitochondrial fission is enhanced in PINK1‐ deficient MEFs, and that increased expression of Drp1 on mitochondria and activation of Drp1 is highly significant in PINK1‐deficient multinucleated cells. Deregulated and increased levels and activation of mitochondrial fission via Drp1 was shown to be a major feature of cell cycle defects caused by PINK1 deletion, both during progression through G2/M and cell cycle exit following serum removal. Altered PINK1 localisation was also observed during progression of mitosis, and upon serum deprivation. Thus, PINK1 dissociated from the mitochondria during the mitotic phases and localised to mitochondria upon serum withdrawal. During serum withdrawal deletion of PINK1 disabled the ability of MEFs to increase mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm), and increase autophagy. This was co‐incident with increased mitochondrial fission, and increased localisation of Drp1 to mitochondria following serum deprivation. Together, this indicates an inability of PINK1‐negative cells to respond protectively to this stress‐induced state, primarily via impaired mitochondrial function. In contrast, PINK1 overexpression was found to protect cells from DNA damage following treatment with oxidants. In addition, deletion of PINK1 blocked the ability of cells to re‐enter the cell cycle in response to insulin‐like growth factor‐1 (IGF‐1), a major cancer promoting agonistwhich acts primarily via PI3‐kinase/Akt activation. Furthermore, PINK1 mRNA expression was significantly increased following serum deprivation of MCF‐7 cells, and this was rendered more significant upon additional inhibition of PI3‐kinase. Conversely, IGF‐1 activation of PI3‐kinase/Akt causes a time‐dependent and significant reduction of PINK1 mRNA expression that was PI3‐kinase dependent. Together these results indicate that PINK1 expression is necessary for IGF‐1 signalling and is regulated reciprocally in the absence and presence of IGF‐1, via PI3‐kinase/Akt, a signalling system which has major tumour‐promoting capacity in cancer cell biology. The results of this thesis indicate PINK1 is a candidate tumour-promoting gene which has a significant function in the regulation of the cell cycle, and growth factor responses, at key cell cycle checkpoints, namely, during progression through G2/M and during exit of the cell cycle following removal of serum. Furthermore, the results reveal that the regulation of mitochondrial fission and Drp1 function is mechanistically important in the regulation of cell cycle control by PINK1. As deregulation of the cell cycle is linked to both tumourigenesis and neurodegeneration, the findings of this thesis are of importance not just for understanding cancer biology, but also in the context of PINK1‐associated neurodegeneration.

Modified cyclodextrins as novel non-viral vectors for neuronal siRNA delivery: focus on Huntington’s disease

Huntington’s Disease (HD) is a rare autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disease caused by the expression of a mutant Huntingtin (muHTT) protein. Therefore, preventing the expression of muHTT by harnessing the specificity of the RNA interference (RNAi) pathway is a key research avenue for developing novel therapies for HD. However, the biggest caveat in the RNAi approach is the delivery of short interfering RNA (siRNAs) to neurons, which are notoriously difficult to transfect. Indeed, despite the great advances in the field of nanotechnology, there remains a great need to develop more effective and less toxic carriers for siRNA delivery to the Central Nervous System (CNS). Thus, the aim of this thesis was to investigate the utility of modified amphiphilic β-cyclodextrins (CDs), oligosaccharide-based molecules, as non-viral vectors for siRNA delivery for HD. Modified CDs were able to bind and complex siRNAs forming nanoparticles capable of delivering siRNAs to ST14A-HTT120Q cells and to human HD fibroblasts, and reducing the expression of the HTT gene in these in vitro models of HD. Moreover, direct administration of CD.siRNA nanoparticles into the R6/2 mouse brain resulted in significant HTT gene expression knockdown and selective alleviation of rotarod motor deficits in this mouse model of HD. In contrast to widely used transfection reagents, CD.siRNA nanoparticles only induced limited cytotoxic and neuroinflammatory responses in multiple brain-derived cell-lines, and also in vivo after single direct injections into the mouse brain. Alternatively, we have also described a PEGylation-based formulation approach to further stabilise CD.siRNA nanoparticles and progress towards a systemic delivery nanosystem. Resulting PEGylated CD.siRNA nanoparticles showed increased stability in physiological saltconditions and, to some extent, reduced protein-induced aggregation. Taken together, the work outlined in this thesis identifies modified CDs as effective, safe and versatile siRNA delivery systems that hold great potential for the treatment of CNS disorders, such as HD.

Identification and characterization of innate immune receptor substrates of γ-secretase enzyme complex

The γ-secretase protease complexes and associated regulated intramembrane proteolysis play an important role in controlling receptor-mediated intracellular signalling events, which have a central role in Alzheimer’s disease, cancer progression and immune surveillance. It has previously been reported that the Interleukin-1 receptor, type 1, (IL-1R1) is a substrate for regulated intramembrane proteolysis, mediated by presenilin (PS)-dependent γ-secretase activity. The aims of this project were twofold. Firstly, to determine the conservation of regulated intramembrane proteolysis as a physiological occurrence amongst other cytokine receptors. In this regard, similar to IL-1R1, we identified the Tumour necrosis factor receptor type 1 (TNFR1) and the Toll like receptor 4 (TLR4) as novel γ-secretase substrates. Secondly, given that the diversity of signalling events mediated by the IL-1R1, TLR4 and TNFR1 are spatially segregated, we investigated the spatial distribution, subcellular trafficking and subcellular occurrence of regulated intramembrane proteolysis of IL-1R1, TLR4 and TNFR1. Using dynasore an inhibitor of clathrin-dependent receptor endocytosis, both ectodomain shedding and γ-secretase-mediated cleavage of IL-1R1 were observed post-internalization. In contrast, TNFR-1 underwent ectodomain shedding at the cell surface followed by endosomal γ-secretase-mediated cleavage. Furthermore, immortalised fibroblasts from PS1-deficient mice showed impaired γ-secretasemediated cleavage of IL-1R1 and TNFR1, indicating that both are cleaved by PS1-and not PS2-containing γ-secretase complexes. Subcellular fractionation and immunofluorescence studies revealed that the γ-secretase generated IL-1R1 ICD translocates to the nucleus on IL-1β stimulation. These observations further demonstrate the novel PS-dependent means of modulating IL-1β, LPS and TNFα- mediated immune responses by regulating IL-1R1/TLR4/TNFR1 protein levels within the cells.

The role of presenilin 1 and presenilin 2 in IL-1β-, LPS- and TNFα- mediated signalling events

The importance of γ-secretase protease activities in development, neurogenesis and the immune system are highlighted by the diversity of its substrates and phenotypic characterization of Presenilin (PS)-deficient transgenic animals. Since the discovery of Amyloid precursor protein (APP) and it’s cleavage by γ-secretase complexes, over 90 other type I membrane proteins have been identified as γ-secretase substrates. We have identified interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor type I (IL-1R1), toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNFα) receptor-1 (TNFR1) as novel substrates for - secretase cleavage, which play an important role in innate immunity. In this study, using PS-deficient cells and PS-knockout animal models we examined the role of PS proteins, PS1 and PS2, in IL-1R1-, TLR4- and TNFR1- mediated inflammatory responses. Data presented show that in response to IL- 1β, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or TNFα, immortalised fibroblasts from PS2- deficient animals have diminished production of specific cytokines and chemokine, with differential reduction in nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and (mitogen activated protein kinase) MAPK activities. In contrast, no defect in the response to IL-1β, LPS or TNFα was observed in PS1-deficient immortalised fibroblasts. These observations were confirmed using bone marrow-derived macrophages from PS2-null mice, which also display impaired responsiveness to IL-1β- and LPS, with decreased production of inflammatory cytokines. Furthermore, in whole animal in vivo responses, we show that PS2-deficient animals display ligand (IL-1β, LPS and TNFα)-dependent alterations in the production of specific pro-inflammatory cytokines or chemokines. Importantly, this reduced responsiveness to IL-1β, LPS or TNFα is independent of γ- secretase protease activity and γ-secretase cleavage of TNFR1, IL-1R1 or TLR4. These observations suggest a novel γ-secretase-independent role of PS2 in the regulation of innate immune responsiveness and challenge current concepts regarding the regulation of IL-1β-, LPS- and TNFα-mediated immune signalling.